Eileen Agar’s *Angel of Anarchy* (1936–40) invites a close look at how an unusual combination of objects can unsettle familiar meanings. Whitechapel Gallery identifies it and *Angel of Mercy* (1934) as two plaster-cast “Angel” heads. Agar also made sculptures from found objects such as shells, bones, plant life, marine debris, textiles, and feathers. The gallery’s exhibition record does not specify more exact materials for *Angel of Anarchy*, so this reading does not invent them.

A movement with varied visual methods

The Met’s James Voorhies describes Surrealism’s emergence from literary experiments in the late 1910s and early 1920s and Breton’s 1924 manifesto in Paris. Automatism first developed in writing, then visual artists explored painting, drawing, and sculpture through different approaches. Not every Surrealist object was automatically made. The Met essay is useful for that distinction and for the movement’s varied visual practices.

Whitechapel notes Agar’s participation in the 1936 International Surrealist Exhibition in London and her use of found objects in sculpture. This context connects the work to the movement without treating one object as a template for all Surrealism.

A short looking exercise

  • 1. Inventory: List what appears to retain the identity of an ordinary object and what has been reshaped or recombined.
  • 2. Read relations: Explain how the unexpected combination changes the objects’ usual function or scale.
  • 3. Check the evidence: Separate the documented use of found-object sculpture from a guess that the work depicts a particular dream or unconscious image.

A material description begins an interpretation; it does not settle symbolic meaning. Keep visible form separate from possible readings.

Sources